Sex Wars

Dear Editors,

Last issue’s “Intellectual Situation” noticed how many articles in the Atlantic have been “patronizing” toward women. As a childless old lady with no regrets (except my Atlantic subscription), I was delighted to read your spirited rebuke. Imagine my disappointment, then, that the IS went on to characterize the women who currently edit Harper’s as “administrative staff.” In the 1960s I worked for a prominent news magazine, first as a typist and later as an accountant. In both roles I was said to be part of the “administrative staff.” No one would have thought to place our (male) editor-in-chief in that category.

Many years later I had the pleasure of working at a magazine run by a brilliant woman. I worked with her closely enough to see the extent to which the book was genuinely hers. Nonetheless she had to battle persistent rumors that she was the puppet of her ambitious deputy. No points for guessing the sex of her deputy, or which of these two rivals ultimately became the gray eminence we’ve all heard of. So it was frankly chilling for me, a real blow, to find the IS portraying Ellen Rosenbush, the “staffer” who edits Harper’s, as a puppet in the hands of her omnipotent male publisher.

Call me an old-fashioned feminist, but I can’t help wondering if you would have imputed powerlessness so blithely to, say, the New Yorker’s David Remnick.

—Susan Dougherty

Dear Editors,

A few of us women out here in Silicon Valley were interested to learn from the “Intellectual Situation” that we are the internet. Apparently this new reality is reflected everywhere except on the boards of a few stodgy East Coast magazines. Looks good on paper! But before declaring victory, you might want to examine a few other boards. Here are the executive officers of Google: Larry Page, Eric Schmidt, Nikesh Arora, David Drummond, Patrick Pichette. Here’s the list for Amazon: Jeff Bezos plus eleven senior vice presidents, the top ten of whom are male. You don’t even want to see the list for Apple, believe me. Or Microsoft. Or fucking Twitter. There’s a reason why Facebook’s second-in-command, Sheryl Sandberg, is so famous: she’s the exception. It doesn’t make my day to report this, but the truth is that a few thousand men are the internet, along with Sheryl Sandberg. You’re not doing us any favors by pretending otherwise.

—Katie Park

More from Issue 16

Issue 16 Double Bind

Art mostly expresses class and status hierarchies, and only secondarily might have snippets of aesthetic value.

Issue 16 Double Bind

When even whiteness is freighted in liberal circles with maudlin guilt, no color is safer than South Asian brown.

Issue 16 Double Bind

Cultural considerations wax as political hopes wane.

Issue 16 Double Bind
Sandy Hook
Issue 16 Double Bind

I had never had a coregasm and my sexual expectations conformed to widely held, government-sanctioned ideals.

Issue 16 Double Bind
The Merce Cunningham Archives
Issue 16 Double Bind
The Story of My Purity
Issue 16 Double Bind
Heads Ain’t Ready
Issue 16 Double Bind
Tarnac, General Store
Issue 16 Double Bind
Issue 16 Double Bind

What is it that makes Munro’s stories feel so much more true than writing that purports to be entirely so?

Issue 16 Double Bind

Badiou informed Balibar that he, Balibar, was a reformist. “And you, monsieur,” Balibar replied, “are a theologian.”

Issue 16 Double Bind

The new CIA-rehab thriller, as a genre, is anticonspiracy.

More by this Author

Issue 32 Bad Faith
January 8, 2016
Year in Review: 2015
January 13, 2014

It’s unlikely that I will drop n+1, but I was concerned when suddenly fiction started to flood another magazine I enjoy.

Issue 10 Self-Improvement

The MFA beast has at last been offered a look in the mirror, and may finally come to know itself as it is.

Issue 3 Reality Principle

Poor R. The double-bind he’s in has made him lose his mind. Or maybe it’s the Pinot Noir?

Issue 1 Negation

There is a kind of fake refinement that turns into a vulgarity . . . it comes from deciding what other people can’t say.